CommunityGrowthWebB2C

Migrating 10k members: designing a segmented upgrade flow.

On Deck migration flow

I joined On Deck as Lead Product Designer in April 2021 and moved into a Product Design Manager role a year later, growing the design team from two to five as the company grew. While splitting my time between my managerial and design responsibilities, I took on one of the more complex projects of my time there: a full profile page redesign and a segmented migration strategy.

On Deck's entire value proposition rested on its community — the peer connections, introductions, and shared context that made membership worth having. As the platform scaled past 10,000 members, that value was at risk: outreach between members was declining. It was clear that the profile page — the primary mechanism for discovery and connection — had stopped doing its job.

10k+ Community members
2→5 Design team growth

When the profile page stopped working.

Engagement data from Mixpanel and in-person user interviews pointed to the same problem: the profile page had lost its utility. Users couldn't tell who was still active on the platform. That ambiguity eroded trust — if you can't gauge whether someone is likely to respond, you don't reach out.

As well as date stamping profile updates, the central addition was an activity feed. Surfacing a member's recent platform activity served as proof of engagement. For members browsing the community, it opened up a secondary entry point into content, sessions, and playlists.

On Deck profile overview
The redesigned profile page, showing the dashboard view and member overview.
On Deck sessions view
Sessions
On Deck playlists view
Playlists
3 New profile features: activity feed, sessions, playlists
2 Research inputs: Mixpanel data + user interviews
10k+ Members on the redesigned page

Migrating 10k members without breaking trust.

A redesigned profile is only as good as the data behind it — rapid growth and multiple rounds of onboarding iteration had left the underlying data fragmented. Profiles held different fields and different depths depending on when a member had joined — some were rich and complete, others near-empty.

We developed a segmented upgrade flow based on three factors: the depth of information already held in a member's profile, their level of platform engagement, and how recently their profile had been updated. These three signals divided the user base into cohorts, each receiving a tailored experience — different outreach channels, different incentives, and a different set of steps to complete.

On Deck upgrade flow segment B
The tailored upgrade experience for Segment B — prompts and steps adapted to profile depth and engagement level.
On Deck segmented upgrade flow
The segmented upgrade flow, showing the tailored steps for each user cohort.

For members with rich profiles, the ask was light: a short confirmation and a few additions. For members with sparse profiles, the approach was softer — email outreach, gentler prompts, and clear framing around the value of a complete profile. A lot of the design work in this phase was sequencing and copywriting as much as it was UI.

3 Factors in the segmentation model
3 Tailored upgrade experiences per cohort
Copied — vickyloufox@gmail.com